Google has released a new Pro model of its latest AI, Gemini, which company officials say has outperformed GPT-3.5 (the free version of ChatGPT) in extensive testing. According to the performance report, Gemini Ultra Exceed current state-of-the-art results On 30 of the 32 academic benchmarks widely used in large-scale language model (LLM) research and development. Google has been accused of lagging behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which is widely considered the most popular and powerful in the AI field. Google says Gemini has been trained to be multimodal, meaning it can process different types of media, including text, images, video, and audio.
insider Gemini Ultra also reports that it is the first model to outperform human experts with a score of 90.0%. MMLU (Large Multitasking Language Comprehension), tests both your knowledge and knowledge of the world using a combination of 57 subjects including Mathematics, Physics, History, Law, Medicine, and Ethics. problem solving ability.
Google-based AI comes in three sizes or tiers for the Gemini platform. Ultra, flagship model, Pro, Nano (designed for mobile devices). According to a report from TechCrunch, the company announced on December 13 that it will make Gemini Pro available to enterprise customers and AI Studio developers through the Vertex AI program. According to the report, the Pro version can also be accessed via Bard, the company’s chatbot. interface.
Eli Collins, vice president of products at DeepMind (the Google division responsible for building AI platforms), told TechCrunch that Gemini Ultra can understand “subtle” information in text, images, audio, and code.
Collins shared that some of the data used to develop the app came from publicly available web sources. However, the company did not directly address the source of the AI’s training.
As more features emerge, Gemini and other AI products are also focusing on consent. Performance outcomes aside, what about the raw materials needed to make these platforms powerful? I’m not talking about energy, hardware, or chips. ChatGPT and other AI platforms are trained on (and powered by) the work of millions of artists, inventors, teachers, and writers. Microsoft, GitHub, OpenAI, and Stability AI have all been sued by content creators. Under litigation alleging unfair use. Famous writers like John Grisham (office) and George R.R. Martin (game of thrones) defines Open AI as a “systematic grand theft” reported the Associated Press.
According to the U.S. Copyright Office, fair use Permitted for use under the principles of U.S. copyright law limited part of the work This includes citations for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and academic reporting. In fact, this article uses such quotes and provides attribution. The challenge for Gemini, ChatGPT, and other AI solutions is that they don’t have “permission” from the original human creators. If you use the entire work to create something new, there is no compensation. These authors and creators are de facto trainers of AI and are not compensated for their guidance or contributions.
“Only the copyright owner of a work has the right to prepare, or permit others to create, new versions of that work,” the copyright website states. “Therefore, you cannot claim copyright no matter how much you modify someone else’s work without the consent of the owner.” How do these laws and rules apply to artificial intelligence? And how quickly will the results unfold?
follow me twitter or linkedin. check out my Website or my other works here.