Mr. Pierre Breet, a conservative leader, says that he has refused briefing conditions from a Canadian spy institution on foreign interference because he cannot act based on information.
“We are trying to share information with official opposition leaders through threat reduction measures,” said Canadian Security Security Service (CSIS).
But Poilievre spokesman said on Tuesday that the conservative leaders could not act based on the information received from CSIS briefing.
“”[Poilievre] It is legally hindered to talk about briefing with non -legal advisors, so that the government can take action only as explicitly approved, so that the received relevant information cannot be used effectively. You can do it, “said Spokesman Sebastian Skamsky to CBC news mentioned in the statement.
Skamski stated that not allowing POILIEVRE to act is contrary to the point of the threat reduction scale in the first place.
Other leaders, the leader of the party, calls on Poilievre to obtain security clearance so that foreign interference can be confirmed. However, conservative leaders have refused these calls and argue that they cannot speak or criticize the government freely based on the best information. POILIEVRE said he received a classified briefing of his Chief of Staff, Ian Todd.
In October, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said in a public survey that is studying foreign interference, “Many parliamentarians, former council members, and/or the Candidates of the Canadian Conservative Party are being named. Or a person with high risk, high risk, or foreign interference.
It is known that Marie Jose Hogg, a public investigation commissioner on foreign interference, is known that the state is trying to interfere with each other, but the survey of Canadian foreign interference is a member of the parliament. Contrary to, we are working with outside actors. Hogue’s report concludes that foreign interference did not affect the results of the two general elections in the past.
Poiriebles pushed back, and the Prime Minister said that he should give him a name during his testimony.
In the latter half of October, Torudeau asked the intelligency news agency to find a way to easily explain Poyliere about the foreign interference filed in which his party involved, and probably provided a conservative guidance of some names. He said he asked him to find a way to share with him.
SKAMSKI said that CSIS briefing only touched on foreign interference “with conservative politicians” and did not deal with the problem proposed by Tordow.
“The government has intended to be an individual who has been nominated or nominated as a candidate for the party, in the intended briefing, not in conjunction with the current Congress of Congress. He advised him that he had no touch of briefing, “he said.
CBC News asked the Prime Minister’s office to comment, but has not yet been answered.
When the response was reached, CSIS did not comment on briefing conditions or POILIEVRE concerns.
“This briefing is designed to enhance security and deal with risks associated with specific threats, and guarantee that the provided classified information is limited to those that are evaluated as needed.” The institution stated by email.
Committee member Marie Jose Hogg, the head of foreign interference, announced her final report on Tuesday.
The report stated that although the committee noticed some of the actions, there was no evidence that the parliamentary “traitor” was planning a hostile state against Canada’s profits.
Hogue wrote that foreigners have seen some cases in trying to curry parliamentarians into curry, but wrote that “this phenomenon is small and hardly effective.”
In a list of recommendations for fighting foreign interference, Hogg said, “All leaders of all political parties represented by the House of Representatives should be encouraged, and after becoming a leader, the secret as soon as possible. It should be given the opportunity to obtain security.